By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Today in CanadaToday in CanadaToday in Canada
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • News
  • Lifestyle
  • Things To Do
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • Press Release
  • Spotlight
Reading: Proposed class action claims government misled property owners in light of Cowichan Tribes decision
Share
Today in CanadaToday in Canada
Font ResizerAa
  • News
  • Things To Do
  • Lifestyle
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Travel
Search
  • Home
  • News
  • Lifestyle
  • Things To Do
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • Press Release
  • Spotlight
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
Today in Canada > News > Proposed class action claims government misled property owners in light of Cowichan Tribes decision
News

Proposed class action claims government misled property owners in light of Cowichan Tribes decision

Press Room
Last updated: 2025/11/25 at 11:14 PM
Press Room Published November 25, 2025
Share
SHARE

Listen to this article

Estimated 3 minutes

The audio version of this article is generated by text-to-speech, a technology based on artificial intelligence.

A proposed class action lawsuit accuses the federal and B.C. governments of keeping property owners in the dark amid the Cowichan Tribes Aboriginal title ruling.

The lawsuit — filed in B.C. Supreme Court — appears to be the first separate civil suit to emerge from a groundbreaking decision that found that Aboriginal title co-exists with so-called fee simple title on about 150 pieces of private property in Richmond, B.C.

The proposed class action alleges the federal and B.C. governments failed to “properly defend the rights of property owners” caught up in Justice Barbara Young’s ruling, which awarded Quw’utsun (Cowichan) Nation Aboriginal title to between 300 and 325 hectares of land just east of the Massey Tunnel, where the nation once had a traditional village.

The decision has resulted in confusion and uncertainty over what it means for the status and validity of private ownership, despite Indigenous leaders calling how the City of Richmond and the province have reacted to it fear-mongering and a barrier to reconciliation.

Young’s ruling doesn’t invalidate individual property rights, but the judge said the Crown would have to work with the Quw’utsen to “negotiate and reconcile” the co-existence of Aboriginal title and private property rights.

She suspended her ruling for 18 months to allow governments time to understand the decision and figure out how to proceed with it.

The province and the City of Richmond are both appealing Young’s decision, as are the other parties to the ruling.

Misfeasance claim

The new legal action claims misfeasance, which in this case means the wrongful exercise of legal authority.

Filed on Nov. 21, it alleges the two senior levels of government misled property owners by continuing to assure the public that private property was “safe, marketable and free from material qualification” despite having knowledge of potential risks posed by unresolved Indigenous land claims.

It also claims the governments “caused economic and psychological harm” to the plaintiffs and any future class members by collecting taxes, fees and charges “based on inflated or misinformed property values.”

The lead plaintiff is Jasjeet Rampee Grewall, who the claim says owns a hazardous material removal company in Burnaby. It also lists a Richmond property owner as a second plaintiff under the name “John Doe,” a legal term often used as a placeholder in class action proceedings before actual people have been found.


The suit seeks relief — potentially for all private property owners in B.C. — in several ways, including general damages “for loss of property value and mental distress,” along with “restitution or disgorgement of taxes and fees collected under misrepresented conditions.”

It also seeks a declaration from the province and federal governments that their “conduct was unlawful and contrary to their duties of good faith and candour; a declaration requiring full disclosure of known risks affecting registered property in British Columbia.”

None of the claims have been proven in court, and the proposed class action will require certification from a judge before it can proceed.

CBC News has contacted the provincial and federal governments for comment.

They have 21 days to file legal responses from the time of being served with the claim.

Quick Link

  • Stars
  • Screen
  • Culture
  • Media
  • Videos
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Sleepy0
Angry0
Dead0
Wink0
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You Might Also Like

News

Colleen Jones, champion curler and CBC reporter, dies at 65

November 26, 2025
News

NHL catch-up: Canadian players hot, Canadian teams cold

November 25, 2025
News

Indigenous writers, academics say they aren’t shocked to hear Thomas King’s not Cherokee

November 25, 2025
News

Quebec’s language law causes confusion for English speakers, federal commissioner says

November 25, 2025
© 2023 Today in Canada. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?