By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Today in CanadaToday in CanadaToday in Canada
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • News
  • Lifestyle
  • Things To Do
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • Press Release
  • Spotlight
Reading: Canada proposes keeping Nunavut fishing licences with non-Inuit organization
Share
Today in CanadaToday in Canada
Font ResizerAa
  • News
  • Things To Do
  • Lifestyle
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Travel
Search
  • Home
  • News
  • Lifestyle
  • Things To Do
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • Press Release
  • Spotlight
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
Today in Canada > News > Canada proposes keeping Nunavut fishing licences with non-Inuit organization
News

Canada proposes keeping Nunavut fishing licences with non-Inuit organization

Press Room
Last updated: 2025/12/05 at 9:35 PM
Press Room Published December 5, 2025
Share
SHARE

Listen to this article

Estimated 4 minutes

The audio version of this article is generated by text-to-speech, a technology based on artificial intelligence.

The Qikiqtani Inuit Assocation says it’s “extremely disappointed” the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) is looking to reissue fishing licences off Nunavut’s coast to non-Inuit operations.

That decision from DFO was made despite a federal court judge saying the initial decision by Ottawa was unreasonable. 

In a news release Friday, DFO said that proposal is based on the department’s “preliminary analysis.” DFO did not state the contents of that analysis.

In 2021, then DFO minister Bernadette Jordan reissued fishing licences to a coalition of seven Mi’kmaq First Nations, as part of the sale of Clearwater Foods to FNC Quota.

Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. (NTI) and the Qikiqtani Inuit Association (QIA) filed a lawsuit over that decision.

That’s because the sale would have given Nunavut Inuit a window to acquire those fishing licences, which predominantly involve the harvest of Greenland halibut (turbot) and shrimp. But Jordan transferred the licences to the Mi’kmaq coalition, which bought 50 per cent of Clearwater Foods, which called itself Atlantic Canada’s largest fishing company. 

The two Nunavut Inuit organizations argue the minister failed to consider provisions under Article 15 of the Nunavut Agreement, which states the federal government should give “special consideration” when allocating commercial fishing licences, based on the adjacency and economic dependence of communities. That means local Nunavut communities should benefit from local resources.

But in an April 2024 decision, Federal Court Justice Paul Favel said Jordan’s decision in 2021 failed to meet the special considerations of Nunavut. 

DFO declined an interview with CBC News, but the news release stated the redetermination process is being done in a “transparent and fair process  that enables the parties to put forward all relevant information and views,” while also taking into consideration the Nunavut Agreement.

A map of offshore fishing zones in Nunavut.
The Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization uses this map to divide fishing zones. Nunavut Inuit are fighting to have a larger share of halibut and shrimp quotas in Zones 0A and 0B, off the coast of Baffin Island. (Fisheries and Oceans Canada)

Recommendations undercut Nunavut’s economy

In a statement to CBC News, Clearwater Seafoods said the transfer of the licences is widely celebrated as a model of economic reconciliation.

“The report confirms the validity of the transfer of these licences and protects the significant, landmark investment of the Mi’kmaq as they take their rightful place within the Canadian fishing industry,” the statement reads.

QIA said they have fought for decades alongside NTI to “address systemic Inuit exclusion from commercial fishing opportunities in Nunavut adjacent waters”.

“Rather than chart a path toward equity, DFO’s latest recommendations simply maintain the status quo — allowing access to commercial fisheries to remain in non-Nunavut control and undercutting Nunavut’s economy and Inuit economic well-being for yet another generation,” QIA wrote in a statement.

In a document released in 2023, QIA called the fishery in Nunavut an “underdeveloped pillar of the Nunavut economy”, however, it argued the federal government has failed to fairly distribute commercial fishing licences in Nunavut’s adjacent waters, as required by the Nunavut Agreement. As a result, QIA said Nunavut interests only hold around 52 per cent of the quota in adjacent waters, compared to other jurisdictions like British Columbia and Newfoundland which hold around 80 to 90 per cent.

QIA estimated between 1993 and 2022, Nunavut Inuit have lost approximately $1 billion in economic benefits and opportunities. 

While the redetermination process is ongoing, DFO said the three affected fishing licenses remain valid under the name FNC Quota. They can be fished in accordance with their terms, until the minister makes her final decision on the redetermination process. 

The parties have until Jan. 9 to respond to DFO’s preliminary analysis, before the department puts forward its final recommendation to the minister.

Quick Link

  • Stars
  • Screen
  • Culture
  • Media
  • Videos
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Sleepy0
Angry0
Dead0
Wink0
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You Might Also Like

News

Behind the scenes of John Rustad’s downfall as B.C. Conservative leader

December 5, 2025
News

Conservation officers call off search for grizzly in Bella Coola attack

December 5, 2025
News

Senate unanimously passes bill to eliminate Indian Act’s 2nd-generation cut-off

December 5, 2025
News

Top court restores conviction of woman who tried to kill mother with insulin injection

December 5, 2025
© 2023 Today in Canada. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?