By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Today in CanadaToday in CanadaToday in Canada
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • News
  • Lifestyle
  • Things To Do
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • Press Release
  • Spotlight
Reading: Alberta Premier Danielle Smith says courts should not be gatekeepers on independence questions
Share
Today in CanadaToday in Canada
Font ResizerAa
  • News
  • Things To Do
  • Lifestyle
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Travel
Search
  • Home
  • News
  • Lifestyle
  • Things To Do
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • Press Release
  • Spotlight
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
Today in Canada > News > Alberta Premier Danielle Smith says courts should not be gatekeepers on independence questions
News

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith says courts should not be gatekeepers on independence questions

Press Room
Last updated: 2025/12/07 at 10:29 PM
Press Room Published December 7, 2025
Share
SHARE

Listen to this article

Estimated 3 minutes

The audio version of this article is generated by text-to-speech, a technology based on artificial intelligence.

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith says anyone seeking an independence referendum should not have “gatekeepers,” like the courts, standing in their way.

Smith was asked about the independence question Saturday on her radio call-in show, weighing in for the first time after her government proposed legislation that would grind to a halt an ongoing court case over a proposed provincial vote to leave Canada.

She said giving Justice Minister Mickey Amery the power to be “permissive” about referendum questions, which is included in the new legislation, upholds democracy.

“Whether it’s the chief electoral officer or the court, they seem to want to approve the ones they like and hold up the ones they don’t like, and that’s not democracy,” Smith said.

Her comments came a day after Alberta Justice Colin Feasby said a separatist referendum question would go against the Charter, First Nations Treaty rights and the province’s existing referendum law.

The separation question was referred to the courts by Alberta’s chief electoral officer, Gordon McClure, this summer. McClure said at the time that he was just following the rules laid out for him, but Smith’s government criticized him for creating red tape.

Feasby said in a Court of King’s Bench decision Friday that Smith’s United Conservative government’s proposed law to change the rules in the middle of the game is undemocratic and undermines the administration of justice.

Smith, however, said Saturday that citizen-initiated referendums were never meant to have “a pile of gatekeepers” holding them back.

New bill would make judge’s ruling ‘moot’

The UCP’s bill, tabled Thursday, would make Feasby’s court decision moot, should it pass into law.

The legislation also gives the separatist group, the Alberta Prosperity Project, the ability to re-apply to start collecting signatures for an independence referendum.

Amery said Thursday his bill provides a “reset,” and the government doesn’t want to see the courts delay direct democracy.

“If those seeking independence believe that they have the support for it, this is their chance to prove it,” he told reporters before introducing the bill.

For months, Smith has said she supports a sovereign Alberta within a united Canada.

She has not explicitly endorsed pulling the province out of Confederation — a move many in her party want her to make.

The government’s bill is yet another move against the courts from Smith’s UCP, which has argued unelected judges have overstepped their boundaries and need to be reigned in.

Her government has invoked the Charter’s notwithstanding clause multiple times during the fall legislature sitting to shield its laws from court challenges.

The UCP used the clause to force teachers across the province back to work and end a three-week-long strike, imposing the terms of a pay agreement roundly rejected by teachers.

That has been one of the driving grievances sparking a groundswell of recall petitions against her caucus members.

The UCP also used the notwithstanding clause to curtail existing and potential legal challenges against three laws affecting transgender people.

Those laws strip away the ability of transgender girls to receive gender-affirming health care, ban transgender female Albertans from competing in sport, and require parental consent when kids want to change their name or pronoun in school.

Quick Link

  • Stars
  • Screen
  • Culture
  • Media
  • Videos
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Sleepy0
Angry0
Dead0
Wink0
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You Might Also Like

News

Interior Health warns of safety risks at resort north of 100 Mile House, B.C.

December 8, 2025
News

NHL Heritage Classic’s 2026 return to Winnipeg will be ‘great for the city,’ fans say

December 8, 2025
News

Majority of Ontario fraud cases tossed since 2020 due to limited resources: Crowns’ association

December 8, 2025
News

Ontario jails set to hit overcrowding record as bail reform looms, data shows

December 8, 2025
© 2023 Today in Canada. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?