By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Today in CanadaToday in CanadaToday in Canada
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • News
  • Lifestyle
  • Things To Do
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • Press Release
  • Spotlight
Reading: B.C. to appeal landmark Aboriginal title ruling over Fraser River land in Metro Vancouver
Share
Today in CanadaToday in Canada
Font ResizerAa
  • News
  • Things To Do
  • Lifestyle
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Travel
Search
  • Home
  • News
  • Lifestyle
  • Things To Do
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • Press Release
  • Spotlight
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
Today in Canada > News > B.C. to appeal landmark Aboriginal title ruling over Fraser River land in Metro Vancouver
News

B.C. to appeal landmark Aboriginal title ruling over Fraser River land in Metro Vancouver

Press Room
Last updated: 2025/08/11 at 8:26 PM
Press Room Published August 11, 2025
Share
SHARE

The most recent Indigenous rights and title ruling in B.C. is heading back to court after the province released a statement saying it plans to appeal the decision.

The Supreme Court of B.C. ruled last week in favour of the Cowichan Tribes on Vancouver Island, granting it fishing rights and Aboriginal title over a parcel of land on Lulu Island in Richmond, B.C.

Niki Sharma, B.C.’s attorney general, said in a statement that the ruling has unintended consequences for private property rights that must be looked at by a higher court. 

“We disagree strongly with the decision. British Columbia will be filing an appeal and seeking a stay to pause implementation until the appeal is resolved,” she said in the statement.

“This case is an example of why the Province prefers to resolve land claims through negotiation — where we can protect property rights directly — rather than risk considerable uncertainty through court decisions.” 

Sharma says that her team is working through what grounds of appeal the province has following the initial ruling.

She says that better resolutions are found by sitting down with First Nations partners, and that her colleagues will be in contact with the Cowichan Nation, which filed the case. 

Ancestral village site

Cowichan Tribes is a First Nation community, and the first named plaintiff in the case. 

Together with the Halalt, Lyackson, Penelakut, and Stz’uminus First Nations, the five First Nations make up the Quw’utsun (Cowichan) Nation.

Cindy Daniels, chief of the Cowichan Tribes, says that the Fraser River was known as the Cowichan River before colonization, and that her people’s presence in the Salish Sea was well known and documented by early settlers in the region. 

Lyackson First Nation Chief Pahalicktun, left, Cowichan Tribes Chief Cindy Daniels, centre, and Premier David Eby, right, sign an incremental treaty agreement in May 2025 to transfer 312 hectares of land. (Dean Stoltz/CHEK News)

“We initially tried to move this work forward through the treaty process, but there was no openness to discussing Tl’uqtinus Village lands and Aboriginal rights to fish in the Fraser River at that table, so we pursued truth and reconciliation through the courts,” she said. 

“While not quick, the courts remain an option for First Nations when we are not heard and our rights are ignored.” 

Daniels says that she is pleased with the recognition of Cowichan Nation rights and title from the province, and that the area identified by the court is still being reviewed by the nation.

Indigenous opposition

The historic ruling comes with backlash from other First Nations whose land base is connected to the South Fraser River, including Musqueam and Tsawwassen. 

In an email to CBC News, the Tsawwassen First Nation says that the nation is aware of the B.C. Supreme Court decision, and that its legal counsel is reviewing it. 

In a news release, the Musqueam First Nation says that “Chief and Council are deeply offended by the recent Supreme Court of British Columbia decision on Cowichan Tribes v Canada. Leadership and our entire community fundamentally disagree with the court’s decision.”

The release says that Musqueam legal counsel is also reviewing the decision.

Quick Link

  • Stars
  • Screen
  • Culture
  • Media
  • Videos
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Sleepy0
Angry0
Dead0
Wink0
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You Might Also Like

News

AOL to end dial-up internet services, a ’90s relic still used in some remote areas

August 11, 2025
News

Bail hearing adjourned for senior Winnipeg officer accused of drug trafficking, sharing photo of dead woman

August 11, 2025
News

What does relentless heat mean for Montreal’s water supply?

August 11, 2025
News

Hamilton police constable suspended after posting content from extremist groups, following CBC investigation

August 11, 2025
© 2023 Today in Canada. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?