Federal and provincial leaders are working to dismantle internal trade barriers that push up the cost of goods and make it harder to do business within Canada.
But anyone expecting all of them to be gone by tomorrow should read the fine print, experts say.
Throughout the spring federal election campaign, Mark Carney as Liberal leader repeatedly vowed to “eliminate” interprovincial trade barriers and create “free trade by Canada Day.”
The rhetoric has been at times confusing and the political scorecard on this one is hard to track.
With July 1 just a day away, Carney’s government has passed its planned changes into law — but it’s more like the start of a conversation than the final word, says internal trade expert Ryan Manucha.
“It’s a starting gun and it’s starting a lot more activity and work, which is honestly the really exciting part,” said Manucha. “If any of this was easy, it would have been done.”
Manucha writes on the topic for the Macdonald-Laurier Institute think-tank and authored the book Booze, Cigarettes, and Constitutional Dust-Ups: Canada’s Quest for Interprovincial Trade.
“When I’m advising governments, I say, ‘Don’t think of this as a light switch,”‘ he said. “We are changing the way that everyone approaches the concept of regulation and risk here, and so it’s going to take some time.”
The rush to break down internal barriers to trade comes in response to U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariff war with Canada. One study estimates that existing internal trade hurdles cost the economy some $200 billion a year.
Manucha said Canada has talked about this problem for decades but is only addressing it seriously now — and it would “never have happened had we not had Trump.”
He said the introduction of the Carney government’s bill on internal trade was “incredible to see” because the idea was just “an academic theory maybe even as little as eight months ago.”
Bill C-5, the omnibus bill that reduces federal restrictions on interprovincial trade and also speeds up permitting for large infrastructure projects, became law on June 26.
An analysis of the law by McMillan Vantage says that “this legislation would not achieve” the elimination of all internal trade barriers.
Provinces hold power
When Carney made his campaign promise, he was talking about cutting red tape put up by the federal government — not the rules set by the provinces, which have the most authority in this area.
The prime minister described this effort as a sort of quid pro quo with the provinces.
“We’re getting rid of a bunch of duplicative federal regulations. We’re going to have a principle of one project, one review — and in exchange, they’re going to agree to eliminate all the barriers to trade and labour mobility,” Carney said at a rally in Kitchener, Ont., on March 26.
“The federal government committed that we will sweep away all of our impediments by Canada Day. Free trade by Canada Day.”
More interprovincial trade is being touted as one potential countermeasure to U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariff threats, but complicated barriers stand in the way. CBC’s Ellen Mauro breaks down why free trade within Canada is so difficult and what needs to happen to get more goods flowing across the country.
But Canada’s internal trade barriers won’t all be eliminated by then — not even all the federal ones.
Canada’s supply management system for dairy products, which sets provincial production quotas, will remain in place. Quebec also retains language requirements that will stay in place.
Credit unions have complained that the new law does not break down barriers to their expansion into multiple provinces.
But just how many federal barriers does the bill eliminate? That’s hard to sort out. A lot of the details will have to wait until regulations are drafted — a process that will involve consultations with affected industries.
“I don’t really know what this legislation could end up doing because a lot of veto power, a lot of discretion still rests with the regulatory authorities,” Manucha said.
“According to the text of that legislation, it would seem like meat inspection would come off. Is [the Canadian Food Inspection Agency] really going to allow for interprovincial trade and inspection of meat coming from non-federally licensed abattoirs? I don’t know.”
Lack of consensus
There is no comprehensive list of existing internal trade barriers. Even some lobby groups have told parliamentarians they don’t know how many barriers their own industries face.
There isn’t even consensus on what all counts as a trade barrier.
“In the provincial legislation in Ontario, they’re talking, for many occupations, [of] having a 30-day service standard for how long it’ll take for credentials to be recognized,” Manucha said. “Nova Scotia, meanwhile, is on the 10-day turnaround time. That’s less than a third. Can you call the 30-day versus 10-day a trade barrier?”
The House10:59Bye bye provincial trade barriers?
Catherine Cullen asks the Minister of Transport and Internal Trade Chrystia Freeland about the government’s legislation to scrap federal interprovincial trade barriers – and if it will really be that easy to create ‘one Canadian economy.’
Internal Trade Minister Chrystia Freeland, who has repeatedly stated that most of the barriers are at the provincial level, testified to the Senate that she will meet with her provincial counterparts on July 8 to discuss next steps.
One major obstacle is in Freeland’s crosshairs: Canada’s patchwork of interprovincial trucking regulations.
“One of three areas that I will be putting on the agenda at that meeting is trucking,” she said on June 16. “It should be a lot easier than it is to drive a truck from Halifax to Vancouver. We need to get rid of conflicting requirements.”
