By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Today in CanadaToday in CanadaToday in Canada
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • News
  • Lifestyle
  • Things To Do
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • Press Release
  • Spotlight
Reading: New trial ordered for Alberta man convicted of 1st-degree murder in 2020 shooting
Share
Today in CanadaToday in Canada
Font ResizerAa
  • News
  • Things To Do
  • Lifestyle
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Travel
Search
  • Home
  • News
  • Lifestyle
  • Things To Do
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • Press Release
  • Spotlight
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
Today in Canada > News > New trial ordered for Alberta man convicted of 1st-degree murder in 2020 shooting
News

New trial ordered for Alberta man convicted of 1st-degree murder in 2020 shooting

Press Room
Last updated: 2025/11/18 at 11:49 AM
Press Room Published November 18, 2025
Share
SHARE

Listen to this article

Estimated 3 minutes

The audio version of this article is generated by text-to-speech, a technology based on artificial intelligence.

Alberta’s top court has overturned a first-degree murder conviction for a man who was sentenced in a fatal 2020 shooting south of Edmonton.

Kardon Demetroff was arrested on May 4, 2020 in the killing of Larry Parker, a 74-year-old landlord whose body was found on a rural road just outside Maskwacis, Alta., on the morning of April 12, 2020.

After a trial in 2022, a jury found Demetroff guilty of first-degree murder, while a woman who was accused alongside him was convicted of manslaughter.

First-degree murder comes with an automatic life sentence, with no eligibility for parole for 25 years. But the Court of Appeal of Alberta has ordered a new trial for Demetroff, with a three-judge panel finding that the trial judge made errors in the way she instructed the jury in several areas.

The Court of Appeal justices say there were issues with the way the jury was told to assess some of what Demetroff said to police, including denying that he was the shooter. He and his co-accused both pointed at each other.

“Here, it was not made clear to the jurors that, if they did not believe the appellant’s exculpatory statements, they could still be left with a reasonable doubt as to his guilt,” the decision says.

“The need for these instructions was particularly acute given that during closing argument, Crown counsel focused on ‘all these lies’ in the appellant’s police statement, and suggested the jury could infer the appellant had shot Mr. Parker in part because of the lies.”

Demetroff will be back in court in Wetaskiwin, Alta., on Nov. 25 to begin the process of scheduling another trial.

Jury ‘insufficiently equipped’ for its role

Parker’s body was discovered a few hours after he’d been called to a Wetaskiwin property by one of his tenants who was complaining about noise coming from upstairs.

Court heard during Demetroff’s 2022 trial that after Parker spoke with the people living there, he went outside and encountered Demetroff and the woman who would be accused alongside him.

The Court of Appeal decision says the pair told police that Parker agreed to drive them somewhere in Wetaskiwin. At some point, Demetroff told Parker that he had a gun and to get out of the vehicle, but Parker didn’t follow him out, and Demetroff told police that he fired once toward the car as it drove away. He denied that the shot hit the victim.

Parker’s SUV was found abandoned about six kilometres away from his body, which was roughly 20 kilometres away from the residence he’d been called to check.

The Crown argued that the killing could be considered first-degree murder because Parker was being confined in the vehicle, and Demetroff was either the “principal shooter,” or he gave the shooter the gun.

The appeal decision also found problems in jury instructions on Demetroff’s actions after the offence. And the judges concluded there was a lack of analysis about whether to admit evidence about “past discreditable conduct” when the jury heard about a separate allegation of violence against the accused and information about his past criminal record.

That, the decision says, contributed to the jury “being insufficiently equipped to perform its role.”

Quick Link

  • Stars
  • Screen
  • Culture
  • Media
  • Videos
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Sleepy0
Angry0
Dead0
Wink0
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You Might Also Like

News

GREY CUP 2025: Follow live updates as Roughriders parade down the Green Mile

November 18, 2025
News

Team Canada unveils athlete outfits for Milan-Cortina Olympics, Paralympics

November 18, 2025
News

Why Ontario researchers want more people to eat fermented food

November 18, 2025
News

Parents, doctors call for free RSV shots for all infants in B.C.

November 18, 2025
© 2023 Today in Canada. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?