By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Today in CanadaToday in CanadaToday in Canada
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • News
  • Lifestyle
  • Things To Do
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • Press Release
  • Spotlight
Reading: Supreme Court of Canada affirms Sask. man’s acquittal in use of Good Samaritan law
Share
Today in CanadaToday in Canada
Font ResizerAa
  • News
  • Things To Do
  • Lifestyle
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Travel
Search
  • Home
  • News
  • Lifestyle
  • Things To Do
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • Press Release
  • Spotlight
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
Today in Canada > News > Supreme Court of Canada affirms Sask. man’s acquittal in use of Good Samaritan law
News

Supreme Court of Canada affirms Sask. man’s acquittal in use of Good Samaritan law

Press Room
Last updated: 2025/10/24 at 6:35 PM
Press Room Published October 24, 2025
Share
SHARE

The Supreme Court of Canada has affirmed the acquittal of a man who was arrested at the scene of a drug overdose, saying he had immunity under a law intended to reduce the number of substance use deaths.

The top court’s 6-3 judgment Friday said Paul Eric Wilson’s arrest in Saskatchewan five years ago seriously violated his Charter rights due to the shielding effect of the Good Samaritan Drug Overdose Act.

In 2017, Parliament approved the Good Samaritan law — an amendment to the broader Controlled Drugs and Substances Act — to help save lives from overdoses.

Under the provision, no one who seeks emergency medical or police assistance can be charged or convicted of simple drug possession if the evidence was discovered because that person sought assistance or stayed at the scene of the emergency.

Wilson was with three companions in Vanscoy, Sask., in September 2020 when one of them slipped into unconsciousness after using fentanyl. Vanscoy is about 25 kilometres southwest of Saskatoon.

A member of the group called 911 and an RCMP officer arrived.

Wilson was arrested for drug possession and, after a search, he was arrested a second time.

Wilson was not charged with any drug offence. He was, however, eventually convicted on several firearm and identity document charges.

‘Reach for the Narcan, not the handcuffs’

In 2023, Saskatchewan’s Court of Appeal overturned Wilson’s convictions and entered acquittals.

It concluded that Wilson could not be charged with simple possession of a controlled substance due to the Good Samaritan provision, and therefore his first arrest was unlawful.

In its ruling Friday, the Supreme Court upheld the Court of Appeal decision.

Pierre Hawkins is public legal counsel at the John Howard Society of Saskatchewan, which intervened in the case.

Hawkins welcomed the decision, saying it sends a clear message for those who may use drugs.

“Don’t worry about being arrested for simple possession of drugs. Call 911. Don’t worry that other people at the scene who have stayed will be arrested. The priority of the law of the court is to make sure that that person receives medical treats,” Hawkins told CBC News on Friday.

Justice Andromache Karakatsanis, writing for the majority of Canada’s top court, found the immunity from charge and conviction for simple possession explicitly mentioned in the Good Samaritan provision includes, by necessary implication, immunity from arrest for that offence.

“This interpretation best serves the clear purpose of the provision: to save lives,” she said.

An interpretation that allows arrests for possession, and intrusive searches incident to those arrests, would create a strong disincentive to seek emergency assistance in life-threatening overdose situations, Karakatsanis added.

“Parliament did not intend this result,” she wrote.

Since the Good Samaritan provision immunizes eligible individuals from arrest for simple possession, the initial arrest of Wilson was unlawful and breached his Charter right to be free from arbitrary detention, Karakatsanis said.

In turn, this means the search incident to that arrest was not authorized by law and was a breach of his Charter guarantee against unreasonable search or seizure, she added.

Wilson had immunity under the Good Samaritan provision when he was arrested for possession, Karakatsanis wrote.

“Arresting him despite his immunity was a serious breach of his Charter rights that warrants the exclusion of evidence gathered consequent to the arrest,” she said. “The Court of Appeal was right in the circumstances to enter acquittals on all charges.”

The Vancouver-based Pivot Legal Society, another intervener in the Supreme Court case, also applauded the decision.

“At a time when governments at every level are continuing to back the deadly war on people who use drugs, we needed a ruling like this,” said Caitlin Shane, a staff lawyer for the group.

The John Howard Society’s Hawkins said the decision also provides clear direction to police when they respond to a 911 call about an overdose.

“The answer is reach for the Narcan, not the handcuffs,” said Hawkins, referring to a brand name for naloxone, which is used to treat drug overdoses.

Quick Link

  • Stars
  • Screen
  • Culture
  • Media
  • Videos
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Sleepy0
Angry0
Dead0
Wink0
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You Might Also Like

News

Alberta schools, educators, students preparing for classes to resume if bill orders teachers back to work

October 24, 2025
News

Inuit leader replaced amid allegations of abuse

October 24, 2025
News

Alberta ends hybrid work model for government employees, effective February

October 24, 2025
News

One arrested after fire breaks out in Knox Mountain Park in Kelowna, B.C.

October 24, 2025
© 2023 Today in Canada. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?