By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Today in CanadaToday in CanadaToday in Canada
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • News
  • Lifestyle
  • Things To Do
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • Press Release
  • Spotlight
Reading: Winnipeg driver claims he got licence suspended because of ‘inaccurate’ cannabis test
Share
Today in CanadaToday in Canada
Font ResizerAa
  • News
  • Things To Do
  • Lifestyle
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Travel
Search
  • Home
  • News
  • Lifestyle
  • Things To Do
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • Press Release
  • Spotlight
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
Today in Canada > News > Winnipeg driver claims he got licence suspended because of ‘inaccurate’ cannabis test
News

Winnipeg driver claims he got licence suspended because of ‘inaccurate’ cannabis test

Press Room
Last updated: 2025/05/08 at 3:29 PM
Press Room Published May 8, 2025
Share
SHARE

A Winnipeg man says police temporarily suspended his licence for driving while high even though he was not under the influence, and is arguing the test used by officers wasn’t accurate.

Sean Vipond, 30, said he was one of the 97 people who were issued roadside licence suspensions earlier this year as part of an enforcement campaign because they tested positive for cannabis consumption — but he maintains he wasn’t under the influence.

He was pulled over in mid-February, after he had just stopped by a local dispensary to buy vape pen cartridges and was on his way to pick up his wife from work, he told CBC.

Vipond said it had been at least 20 hours since he’d last consumed cannabis, but still tested positive for the drug after police performed an oral fluid test, swabbing his mouth.

“[Police] told me to my face that there was no visible reason for suspicion. It was just purely on the basis of I had bought weed and then drove,” Vipond said, adding he was frustrated after police announced the stats from their enforcement campaign last month.

“To see [Winnipeg police] boasting about this and acting like everybody who was caught was … recklessly smoking during the day and driving high, when that’s really not the reality of it — it’s humiliating.”

Winnipeg police say 97 people who were screened for drugs as part of this year’s ‘Don’t Drive High’ campaign tested positive for cannabis. Experts say currently available tests are not an accurate way to gauge impairment. (Winnipeg Police Service)

Winnipeg police said in an email officers use drug screening equipment as approved by the Criminal Code, and that testing positive on such equipment results in an administrative licence suspension in Manitoba.

Last month, police said 47 per cent of 207 drivers who were tested for drugs using approved screening between January and March as part of this year’s “Don’t Drive High” campaign tested positive for cannabis consumption.

The oral swab test is intended to determine whether a driver’s saliva has traces of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the main psychoactive component in cannabis.

But experts say while those tests can detect cannabis in the system, they’re not suited to prove intoxication by themselves.

‘More research is needed’

They said that unlike with alcohol blood levels, THC levels are not an effective proof of impairment.

THC is a lipid that’s “slowly released from our bodies in normal metabolic processes over time,” said Robert Laprairie, an associate professor with the University of Saskatchewan’s college of pharmacy and nutrition.

“What that means functionally, though, is that your rate of release, or rate of getting rid of THC, is going to depend on things like your overall body fat content, your body composition, your sex, your gender, your weight, and how often or how regularly you use THC.”

That means that while a test may show a person has THC in their system, they may not necessarily be impaired, he said.

Laprairie’s research specializes in cannabis, and he’s done work exploring the effects the drug has on the body.

He said that he’s personally seen people process THC in as little as two hours, while for others, it can take up to 36 hours.

“As a researcher, I think more research is needed. I think that we need better tools to understand impairment in terms of what would be impairing in THC use or cannabis use.”

A man with glasses outdoors, smiling.
Dr. Jeff Brubacher said even federal laws aren’t reliable benchmarks for impairment. (Submitted by Dr. Jeff Brubacher)

Dr. Jeff Brubacher, an associate professor at the University of British Columbia whose research specializes in impaired driving, said even federal laws — which set penalties for drivers with two to five nanograms of THC per millilitre of blood, and harsher penalties for those who go over that — aren’t reliable benchmarks.

He said the most effective way to check for impairment may be having a drug recognition expert perform a behavioural test.

“But that’s complicated, right? It takes special training and it takes several hours to do that test, so it’s not readily available,” he said.

Police need evidence before testing: doctor

Brubacher did research on drivers taken for treatment after accidents that showed 3.2 per cent of injured Canadian drivers who had their blood samples collected between 2018 and 2023 had high THC levels (above five nanograms per millilitre). That’s compared to 12.2 per cent who had high alcohol levels.

Testing for THC is “a tool in their toolbox” for police, he said. But “before they can demand a saliva sample, [police] need evidence that the person is impaired. And if they don’t have that evidence, they shouldn’t be using it.”

Vipond said when he was pulled over, he offered to show police the cannabis products he’d purchased, to prove they were still sealed. 

A bearded man
Sean Vipond, 30, says he thinks the test police are using for cannabis impairment is not accurate. ‘If you consume regularly, you simply will not pass that test,’ he says. (Submitted by Sean Vipond)

Police suspended his licence for three days and confiscated it, which Vipond said left him and his wife with no way to get around the city. He also had to pay a $50 fee for recalculating his driver safety rating when he went to renew it.

“If you consume regularly, you simply will not pass that test, no matter how careful you’re being,” he said. “They’re using inaccurate tools and they’re being allowed to treat them as if they’re far more accurate than they are.”

Quick Link

  • Stars
  • Screen
  • Culture
  • Media
  • Videos
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Sleepy0
Angry0
Dead0
Wink0
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You Might Also Like

News

Quebec wants doctors to take on more patients, so it’s moving to regulate their salaries

May 8, 2025
News

800 residents of Alberta village allowed home as crews hold the line on nearby wildfire

May 8, 2025
News

Fear turned to shock when murder accused realized he’d shot an officer, court hears

May 8, 2025
News

Former City of Surrey finance clerk suspected of defrauding city of $2.5 million

May 8, 2025
© 2023 Today in Canada. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?