Listen to this article
Estimated 2 minutes
The audio version of this article is generated by AI-based technology. Mispronunciations can occur. We are working with our partners to continually review and improve the results.
A judge has reserved her decision on whether to set aside a ruling that quashed an Alberta separatist group’s referendum petition, saying she has concerns with parts of the decision.
The ruling last month found that the Stay Free Alberta petition shouldn’t have been issued and that Premier Danielle Smith’s government neglected its duty to consult First Nations.
Alberta Court of Appeal Justice Alice Woolley, hearing arguments Thursday for a stay of the ruling, says aspects of her colleague’s decision make her uneasy.
Woolley pointed to the other judge’s interpretation of legislative changes made last year to the petition process.
Woolley says her concerns shouldn’t be taken as a sign she will rule one way or another.
The petition from the separatist group Stay Free Alberta called for a direct referendum question on the province quitting Canada.
Jeff Rath, a lawyer for the group, applied for a stay of the ruling so that Elections Alberta can verify the petition’s signatures.
The group submitted its petition in May, claiming to have collected nearly 302,000 names. Days later, Court of King’s Bench Justice Shaina Leonard tossed the petition.
Both Rath and the provincial government are appealing Leonard’s decision.
Smith has cited the ruling, the separatist petition and a pro-Canada petition with 404,000 verified signatures as the reason she decided to put a separation question on the province’s Oct. 19 referendum.
The question asks Albertans whether they want to remain in Canada or hold a second, binding vote on separation in the future.
