By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Today in CanadaToday in CanadaToday in Canada
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • News
  • Lifestyle
  • Things To Do
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • Press Release
  • Spotlight
Reading: Carney government ‘not working’ to enshrine nature targets into law, junior nature minister says
Share
Today in CanadaToday in Canada
Font ResizerAa
  • News
  • Things To Do
  • Lifestyle
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Travel
Search
  • Home
  • News
  • Lifestyle
  • Things To Do
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • Press Release
  • Spotlight
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
Today in Canada > News > Carney government ‘not working’ to enshrine nature targets into law, junior nature minister says
News

Carney government ‘not working’ to enshrine nature targets into law, junior nature minister says

Press Room
Last updated: 2026/05/05 at 8:12 PM
Press Room Published May 5, 2026
Share
Carney government ‘not working’ to enshrine nature targets into law, junior nature minister says
SHARE

Listen to this article

Estimated 3 minutes

The audio version of this article is generated by AI-based technology. Mispronunciations can occur. We are working with our partners to continually review and improve the results.

Despite a parliamentary majority, the Carney government has no plans to enshrine recent commitments to protect the country’s waters and lands into federal legislation, said Canada’s junior nature minister.

“Right now, we are not working on that,” said Nathalie Provost, the state secretary for nature, in French at the House of Commons environment committee. 

In 2024, the Trudeau government introduced the Nature Accountability Act, meant to hold the government accountable for achieving the so-called 30×30 nature targets, along with international commitments through the United Nations. 

But the legislation died on the order paper when Canadians went to the polls in 2025.

In a follow-up statement, a spokesperson for Provost backed up her testimony affirming the government’s focus on “results.”

“At this stage, our new government believes this results-based approach is just as effective in delivering measurable outcomes to protect more nature with more partners across the country,” said Marie-France Proulx, director of communications for Provost’s office.

The nature secretary’s response was prompted by a question from Green Party Leader Elizabeth May. Speaking afterwards with CBC News, May said the Carney government’s recent $3.8-billion nature strategy was lacking, but better than nothing.

“Half a loaf is better than nothing,” May said. “On the other hand, without the legislation to hold them to account on the half a loaf, I worry.”

Previous commitments

Prime Minister Mark Carney has committed publicly to achieving the 30×30 target of conserving 30 per cent of Canada’s land and water by 2030.

The 2024 nature bill would have compelled the environment minister to establish and table in Parliament a national biodiversity strategy and action plan, and to report on actions taken to achieve those targets and to establish an advisory committee offering independent advice. 

WATCH | Carney’s past answer on investing and the environment:

‘We are creating a better investment environment’: Carney

Prime Minister Mark Carney told a New York Times reporter that Canada ‘is creating a better investment environment’ compared to other countries when asked how he plans to persuade investments.

According to some, these are necessary to track progress, course-correct and hold accountable governments that would otherwise not consider the issue top of mind.

In a statement, environmental organization Nature Canada said it suspected the government was unlikely to introduce the bill. 

“Nathalie Provost’s statement was our first official confirmation of its position,” said policy director Akaash Maharaj said in a statement. 

Maharaj said the bill would have required major work to give the legislation more teeth, like levying “consequences for failure.” 

“A reintroduction of the original, unamended Bill C-73 would have served no practical purpose, and would have created the appearance of accountability without its substance.”

Quick Link

  • Stars
  • Screen
  • Culture
  • Media
  • Videos
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Sleepy0
Angry0
Dead0
Wink0
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You Might Also Like

Vancouver breaks temperature record last set in 1898 amid hot weather across B.C.
News

Vancouver breaks temperature record last set in 1898 amid hot weather across B.C.

May 5, 2026
Canadiens vs. Sabres: What to know for NHL’s best 2nd-round matchup
News

Canadiens vs. Sabres: What to know for NHL’s best 2nd-round matchup

May 5, 2026
‘Red Dress Day is every day for us’: friend of missing Indigenous woman’s family
News

‘Red Dress Day is every day for us’: friend of missing Indigenous woman’s family

May 5, 2026
Ontario lowers screening age for colorectal cancer to 45
News

Ontario lowers screening age for colorectal cancer to 45

May 5, 2026
© 2023 Today in Canada. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?